Inception (weighing in on pop culture)
Jul. 26th, 2010 12:17 am"Inception" really was a very good movie and you should go see it if you haven't yet. I went to see it for the second time today, and got all the significant hooks that I missed the first time (or at least, I got that they were meant to BE significant, but didn't understand why until the end.) I don't really see why having a movie that rewards multiple viewings is considered an "underhanded marketing tactic" by some reviewers... would they really prefer that works of fiction be disposable one-time-only gags...?
Other than that, most of the criticisms that I've seen in this movie fall into one of two main categories:
1) It's science fiction, which is childish and shallow, and Nolan ought to spend his time on more worthy genres. (Like, say, superhero movies?)
2) They were confused much of the time as to whether what was on screen was supposed to be real or a dream. (Which really leads me to think that they weren't paying attention. Despite a few nods to the age-old "what is the nature of a dream? what is the nature of reality?" debate, the delineations between the real worlds and dream worlds were really quite explicit. As long as you were paying attention.)
Short version: "Oceans Eleven" meets "The Matrix."
Other than that, most of the criticisms that I've seen in this movie fall into one of two main categories:
1) It's science fiction, which is childish and shallow, and Nolan ought to spend his time on more worthy genres. (Like, say, superhero movies?)
2) They were confused much of the time as to whether what was on screen was supposed to be real or a dream. (Which really leads me to think that they weren't paying attention. Despite a few nods to the age-old "what is the nature of a dream? what is the nature of reality?" debate, the delineations between the real worlds and dream worlds were really quite explicit. As long as you were paying attention.)
Short version: "Oceans Eleven" meets "The Matrix."
no subject
Date: 2010-07-26 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-26 05:42 pm (UTC). . .that alone is worth a third viewing. >_>;;
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 05:42 am (UTC)One of my favorite moments: Yusuf rolling the car over, then turning around and being like "DID YOU GUYS SEE THAT :DDD" and then goes " ...aw..." when they're still asleep.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 03:35 am (UTC)Such a cinematic vision of the experience of dreaming--I really liked the way that classic Hollywood editing techniques were subverted by the concept of the film. We're used to being thrown into scenes in media res in film, so we don't even blink when it happens, and the movie was playing with those ingrained expectations and subverting them.