Howl's Moving Castle
May. 1st, 2007 01:47 amLike pretty much any book that has a movie made out of it, fans are often divided on whether the book or the movie is better --- and book fans can usually find something to complain about in the movie version. But all I can say is OMG THIS MOVIE IS SO GOOD. ;_; I'm still a big fan of the book, and the book characters, and the book events, and yeah, the movie does a lot of things very differently.
But the point of the movie is different. It's a lot darker, and more dramatic, and in many ways more heartbreaking. I mean, that war didn't even exist in the book, let alone the creepy goopy monsters that are a Miyazaki staple -- to say nothing of all those gratuitous flight scenes? Where did they come from, indeed?
If nothing else, Movie!Howl is just so much cooler than book!Howl. I mean, I recognize that book!Howl's faults and shortcomings -- his vanity, his shallowness, his cowardliness and self-centeredness -- are all integral to who he is. Diana Wynne Jones is a master character crafter, and a large part of her skill in making characters unique and distinct and successful is that she doesn't shrink from playing out characters' shortcomings to the hilt.
But that still doesn't make movie!Howl any less pretty. Or any less awesome when he's riding an aircraft bomb down to the ground. Or any less adorably, wistfully sad when he's a lonely little boy making a deal with a falling star. Or any less frightening when he's struggling to pull back from losing his humanity. Or any less heartbreaking when he collapses in a heap after carrying Sophie to safety.
So yeah, book!Howl is a great character, awesome in his shallowness, superb in his carelessness. But movie!Howl is just that much cooler.
By the way, I still don't have a copy of this movie on high quality DVD. *hint*hint*May18*hint*
But the point of the movie is different. It's a lot darker, and more dramatic, and in many ways more heartbreaking. I mean, that war didn't even exist in the book, let alone the creepy goopy monsters that are a Miyazaki staple -- to say nothing of all those gratuitous flight scenes? Where did they come from, indeed?
If nothing else, Movie!Howl is just so much cooler than book!Howl. I mean, I recognize that book!Howl's faults and shortcomings -- his vanity, his shallowness, his cowardliness and self-centeredness -- are all integral to who he is. Diana Wynne Jones is a master character crafter, and a large part of her skill in making characters unique and distinct and successful is that she doesn't shrink from playing out characters' shortcomings to the hilt.
But that still doesn't make movie!Howl any less pretty. Or any less awesome when he's riding an aircraft bomb down to the ground. Or any less adorably, wistfully sad when he's a lonely little boy making a deal with a falling star. Or any less frightening when he's struggling to pull back from losing his humanity. Or any less heartbreaking when he collapses in a heap after carrying Sophie to safety.
So yeah, book!Howl is a great character, awesome in his shallowness, superb in his carelessness. But movie!Howl is just that much cooler.
By the way, I still don't have a copy of this movie on high quality DVD. *hint*hint*May18*hint*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 05:15 pm (UTC)I liked some things about the movie, including some of the changes (I liked book and movie Howl equally, though I'd lean towards the book), but the ending was just incoherent. Even more so than the book, and even more so than other Miyazaki movies. He and Jones both tend towards chaotic endings, and I felt like the movie just disintegrated.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 05:46 pm (UTC)I agree that the ending disintegrated -- it was an unfortunate marriage of the chaos of Jones' endings (where the entire cast inevitably shows up and all the plot threads are resolved at once) with Miyazaki's. Suddenly the scarecrow is a prince! Suddenly everybody agrees not to be at war anymore! What? Huh? Had we ever even heard of this character before?!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 01:26 am (UTC)I also did not find movie Howl to be selfish, shallow or cowardly, although he was vain.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-01 12:38 pm (UTC)O rly? I actually didn't know that one -- I confess, I've cough cough mumble mumble never seen a fully subtitled or dubbed version of the movie. Only my crappy, low-rez, theater ripoff.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 02:37 am (UTC)Explanation of who Turnip Head the scarecrow really is is in the second to last paragraph of the story synopsis.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 05:50 pm (UTC)And man, Movie!Howl is so pretty! XD I mean, in the books, they talk a lot about how pretty howl is, but that's not the same as seeing it. And uh, between howl and sophie? even when Sophie is young and fresh, she ain't never as pretty as Howl.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 10:43 pm (UTC)(But, Michael's name. Why? Why would they do a horrible thing like that?)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 09:41 am (UTC)