One more downer today...
Apr. 11th, 2006 11:05 pmIn the Vons (supermarket) today I happened to see, on the cover of the most recent Newsweek, the caption "God and the Founding Fathers." Full of trepidition but bored with standing in line, I checked through the magazine to find the article in question. I was not disappointed. Or well, I was disappointed, but only with the state of humanity slash the U.S. in general, not with the train wreck I expected and found.
Basically, the article went something like: "On the first day of the Constitutional Convention, one of the Episcopalian members stood up and said 'If you don't mind, I'd like to say a little prayer.' Everyone else said 'Is that really appropriate? We're trying to design a secular state here.' Then someone else said 'Well, you can say a prayer if you feel like, if it's your own personal thing.' And thus from that we can see that THE FOUNDING FATHERS MEANT FOR US TO BE A GOD-FEARING FUNDAMENTALIST NATION. The end."
Do I need to remind people AGAIN that half the founding fathers were Deists, and that pretty much ALL of them were agreed on the importance of keeping the State secular and seperate from any institutionalized religion, in order to safeguard both the Church AND the State? Or have the concepts "Deist" "Secular" "Humanist" oh, and possibly "Unitarian" been conveniently erased from your retarded little revisionist vocabulary?
Basically, the article went something like: "On the first day of the Constitutional Convention, one of the Episcopalian members stood up and said 'If you don't mind, I'd like to say a little prayer.' Everyone else said 'Is that really appropriate? We're trying to design a secular state here.' Then someone else said 'Well, you can say a prayer if you feel like, if it's your own personal thing.' And thus from that we can see that THE FOUNDING FATHERS MEANT FOR US TO BE A GOD-FEARING FUNDAMENTALIST NATION. The end."
Do I need to remind people AGAIN that half the founding fathers were Deists, and that pretty much ALL of them were agreed on the importance of keeping the State secular and seperate from any institutionalized religion, in order to safeguard both the Church AND the State? Or have the concepts "Deist" "Secular" "Humanist" oh, and possibly "Unitarian" been conveniently erased from your retarded little revisionist vocabulary?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 03:25 pm (UTC)i was really unhappy the other day while watching bill mahr. he was talking about paranoid christians (cuz they're so oppressed and all) and Missouri. sometimes i'm really sad i moved here. apparently the MO legislature proposed a bill to announce that christianity is the majority religion in the state of MO. as bill mahr said, yeah cuz tons of ppl are saying "i'd like to go to MO, but no.. too jewish."
@_@ idiots. i wish it was more jewish, i can't find a decent challah in the city!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 07:22 pm (UTC)While we're on the subject, happy Passover! right?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 01:30 am (UTC)